HomeAboutEventsIndustryCareerNews
Join
Contact
Sitemap
Search

Maxygen

Last Updated: 2/28/2000
Reviewed By: Abraha Taddese, M.D./Ph.D. Candidate
Maxygen, Inc. (MAXY)
515 Galveston Drive
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 298-5300
www.maxygen.comDATE OF IPO
December 1999

Most Recent Articles

Biocore

Curagen

Lynx

Maxygen

Merck

Neurocrine

Neurogen

 

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM
Russel Howard, Ph.D.: CEO
John Bedbrook, Ph.D: Pres. Agriculture
Willem P. C. Stemmer, Ph.D.:  VP Research
Simba Gill, Ph.D.: CFO, VP Business Development
Joseph Affholter, Ph.D.: VP Biocatalysis and Chemical Processing
Latest Financial Reports
Maxygen evolved out of a family of other successful biotech spinoffs from Glaxo-Wellcome holdings in 1997 and seems organized largely around leveraging their technology for generating “new and improved” versions of known gene products.  So, it comes as no surprise that Maxygen’s apparent strategy is to apply the unique opportunities offered by their technology to many different sectors of the industrial biology marketplace.  This company is already involved in agribusiness, the pharmaceutical industry, and industrial biocatalysts via its partnerships  (i.e. pharmaceuticals-DSM,genetically modified food products-DuPont & AstraZeneca, and biocatalysts-Novo Nordisk).  So, with such a wide variety of potential projects, how do they choose arenas in which to focus?  At least two components of their decision making process are verystraightforward.  Products are considered for both their market value as well as facile “testability” of optimization during the “directed evolution” process.


Perhaps initially, their strategy also appears to include choosing projects for which collaborative support is negotiable.  Strategic partnerships exist with Novo Nordisk (5 year, started 1997), Dupont/Pioneer Hi-Bred (5 year, started 1998), DSM (3 year, 1999), and AstraZeneca (5 year, 1999) totaling 67 million dollars of guaranteed support with additional milestone payments potentially in excess of 145million.  Interestingly, Maxygen also has approximately 27 million dollars worth of governmental grant commitments.
If Maxygen is viewed as yet another company attempting to apply molecular biology to agricultural, pharmaceutical, and biocatalyst industries, then they have a lot of competitors (regardless of the specific technologies).  But, even without a revolutionary technology, Maxygen’s organization seems designed to survive and profit in the long run.  An uncommon quality, perhaps, among many new biotechnology offerings.  With its empirical “directed evolution” technology so diversely applied, it seems likely to generate steady revenues for some time to come. But obviously, public reluctance to support genetically modified agricultural products has the potential to hurt Maxygen’s performance.  However, I do not expect any damage coming from that “high press coverage” corner to be too serious. The amount of capital Maxygen has raised since becoming public is substantial and makes them less dependent on partnerships with GM-interested food developers for the generation of future products.
I have been following Maxygen since before it went public.  And there is one question that I would like to ask Norman Kruse, Maxygen’s Vice President of intellectual property: What is Maxygen’s expectation of patent law regarding more “evolved” versions of protein and gene sequences that already exist in public databases?  Furthermore, what is the precedent for patent protection against slightly altered versions of previously patented recombinant proteins?  Maxygen shows promise as a producer of valuable new and/or modified proteins.  But, if the law is in their favor, they have the potential to gain marketshare against patented products by virtue of slight (or, perhaps, not so slight) superiority.

SCIENCE/TECHNOLOGY
Their “Directed Evolution” or “Molecular Breeding” Technologies consist of DNAShufflingTM (gene recombination) and MaxyScan™ (gene product screening).  I recommend Willem Stemmer’s publications to any interested party (www.maxygen.com).  While some academics may criticize its empirical nature, their technology is very interesting simply from a purely scientific point of view. Roger Tsien might even want to consider a partnership for developing his FRET based calmodulin-GFP calcium sensor into a version with faster kinetics.   Also, their scientific advisory board includes many well-known, respected scientists: Francis Arnold, Baruch S. Blumberg, Arthur Kornberg, Joshua Lederberg, and Alejandro C. Zaffaroni.  Maxygen holds numerous patents covering aspects of its headlining technology as well as others concerned with individual products. Their web pages contain patent and publication lists.